Falinda Oktariani (2017) A Comparative Study on the Effect of Using Predict, Organize, Search, Summarize, Evaluate (POSSE) and Predict, Locate, Add, Note (PLAN) Strategies on Students’ Reading Comprehension at SMA Smart Indonesia Pekanbaru. Thesis thesis, Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau.

	Text 1. 201796PBI-S2COVER FALIN.pdf Download (326kB)
	Text 2. 201796PBI-S2LEMBAR PENGESAHAN.pdf Download (790kB)
	Text 3. 201796PBI-S2Kata Pengantar.pdf Download (333kB)
	Text 4. 201796PBI-S2daftar isi.pdf Download (665kB)
	Text 5. 201796PBI-S2abtract.pdf Download (663kB)
	Text 6.201796PBI-S2CHAPTER 1.pdf Download (532kB)
	Text 7. 201796PBI-S2CHAPTER 2.pdf Download (839kB)
	Text 8. 201796PBI-S2CHAPTER 3.pdf Download (748kB)
	Text 9. 201796PBI-S2CHAPTER 4.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (1MB)
	Text 10. 201796PBI-S2CHAPTER 5.pdf Download (423kB)
	Text 11. 201796PBI-S2Daftar Pustaka.pdf Download (500kB)

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to investigate the comparison between Predict, Organize, Search, Summary, and Evaluate (POSSE) and Predict, Locate, Add, and Note (PLAN) strategies on students’ reading comprehension. It was done based on comparative experimental design which focused on the quantitative research group. Two groups were taken as experimental groups and a group as the comparison group. The sample consisted of 65 students that were taken from 10 th grade classes in the second semester at SMA Smart Indonesia Pekanbaru which comprised of 22 students from X.1 class for experimental group 1 (POSSE strategy), 22 students from X.2 class for experimental group 2 (PLAN strategy), and 21 students from X.3 class for the untreated control group. Observation sheets and reading comprehension tests were used in the study. There were 25 items of multiple choice questions used for the pre-test and post-test. To analyze the data, independent sample t-test and paired sample t-test were calculated by using SPSS 20 with a significant probability of Ho was accepted if P<0.05 or there was no significant effect after giving the treatments, Ha was accepted if P>0.05 or there was no significant effect after giving the treatments. POSSE got the effect size or eta-squared as follows: Eta-squared = 0.83x 100% = 83%. PLAN Strategy got the effect size or eta-squared as follows: Eta-squared = 0.74 x 100% = 74%. The highest effect was from POSSE, but the two classes did not differ significantly. Therefore, the two strategies could improve the students’ reading comprehension. Finally, it can be concluded that the POSSE and PLAN strategies could be applied for teaching reading comprehension at the school.

Actions (login required)

View Item