M. Idris (2014) THE EFFECT OF HOT SEAT STRATEGY ON STUDENTS’ SPEAKING ABILITY AT AL-KAUTSAR ISLAMIC MODERN BOARDING SCHOOL PEKANBARU. Skripsi thesis, Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau.

Preview	Text FM.pdf Download (181kB) | Preview
Preview	Text BAB I.pdf Download (40kB) | Preview
Preview	Text BAB II.pdf Download (183kB) | Preview
Preview	Text BAB III.pdf Download (74kB) | Preview
	Text BAB IV.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (335kB)
Preview	Text BAB V.pdf Download (17kB) | Preview
Preview	Text EM.pdf Download (23kB) | Preview

Abstract

Based on curriculum (KTSP), speaking isone of skills in mastering English that must be taught and learned in junior high school. Al-Kautsar Boarding School is one of the schools that apply it as a guide in teaching learning process. After doing preliminary observation at Al-Kautsar Boarding School Pekanbaru, some of the students of the second year still have low ability in their speaking. The researcher interpreted that they have low ability in speaking were indicated because they still have low vocabularies in expressing their ideas in English. Thus, the researcher interested to conduct the research entitlesThe Effect of Hot Seat Strategy on Students’ Speaking Ability at Al-Kautsar Islamic Modern Boarding School Pekanbaru. The type of the research was quasi-experimental research. The main focus of this research was to find out a significant effect of improvement students’ speaking ability at the second years of Al-Kautsar Islamic Modern Boarding School Pekanbaru between students who were taught by using Hot Seat Strategy and who were taught by using Conventional strategy. The subject of this research was the second year students of Al-Kautsar Boarding School Pekanbaru. In this research, the researcher took two classes; experimental and control class from the three classes. It means that 60 students as the sample from 91 students of population by using clustering sample randomly based on group. In collecting the data, the researcher used test. The test used was oral presentation test. In analyzing the data, the researcher used SPSS16. Finally, the research found that the significant number was 0.000<0.05. Based on the significance result above, Ha is accepted and Ho is rejected. Besides, it can be proved from mean score of students’ speaking ability of post-test at experimental class was 60.87, while students’ speaking ability of post-test at control class was 52.47. Furthermore, the mean score improvement of students’ speaking at experimental class was 12.20 (26.42%) while in control class only 4.40 (9.32%). In conclusion, there is a significance effect of improvement of students’ speaking ability between students who were taught by using Hot Seat Strategy and who were taught by using Conventional Strategy.So, the effect on mean indicate that the use of Hot Seat Strategy is better than Conventional Strategy.

Actions (login required)

View Item