Noviza Helmi (2012) THE EFFECT OF USING CRAZY STORY TOWARD STUDENTS’ABILITY IN WRITING NARRATIVE TEXT AT THE FIRST YEAR OF SMA N 1 TAMBUSAI ROKAN HULU REGENCY. Skripsi thesis, Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau.

Preview

Text 2012_2012828.pdf Download (560kB) | Preview

Abstract

Based on observation, it was found some problems that the students had some difficulties in writing especially writing narrative text, it could was seen in symptoms that some of students are not able to differentiate narrative text and another text, some of students are not able to arrange the sentences into a good text, some of students are not able to use appropriate words in their writing, and some of students are not able to get the passing score; the students’ achievement is low. The formulation of the problem in this research were how students’ ability in writing narrative text taught by using crazy story is, how students’ ability in writing narrative text taught by using conventional strategy is, and whether or not there is significant difference on students’ ability in writing narrative text who taught by using crazy story and who taught by using conventional strategy. This research has three objectives are 1). To find out the data about students’ ability in writing narrative text by using crazy story, 2). To find out the data about students’ ability in writing narrative text by using conventional strategy, 3). To find out the significant difference on students’ ability in writing narrative text which is taught by using crazy story and which is taught by using conventional strategy. The location of this research was SMA N 1 Tambusai that was conducted from March 30th until May 05th 2012. The object of this research was the effect of using Crazy story toward students’ ability in writing narrative text and the subject of this research was the first year students of state senior high school 1 Tambusai. The total population was 147 students which consist of five classes and the sample of this research is 57 students divided into two classes because this research is quasi-experimental research design. Yet, there were only 45 students who always came and followed learning activities. From the research finding, to= 2.960 was compared with tt in significance 5% and 1% (2.02 < 2.960> 2.69). It means Howas rejected and Hawas accepted. It can be concluded that there was a significant difference on students’ ability in writing narrative text between those who were taught by using Crazy Story and those who were taught by using conventional strategy.

Actions (login required)

View Item