THE DIFFERENCE OF ABILITY IN WRITING ANALYTICAL EXPOSITION TEXT OF STUDENTS WHO ARE TAUGHTBY USING CUBING TECHNIQUEAND WHOARETAUGHT BY USING TREE PHASETECHNIQUEATTHE SECONDYEAR STUDENTSOFSMAN12 PEKANBARU

Rina Hidayati, (2012) THE DIFFERENCE OF ABILITY IN WRITING ANALYTICAL EXPOSITION TEXT OF STUDENTS WHO ARE TAUGHTBY USING CUBING TECHNIQUEAND WHOARETAUGHT BY USING TREE PHASETECHNIQUEATTHE SECONDYEAR STUDENTSOFSMAN12 PEKANBARU. Skripsi thesis, Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau.

[img]
Preview
Text
2012_2012726.pdf

Download (917kB) | Preview

Abstract

This research was conducted because some problems were faced by students in learning English especially in writing analytical exposition text. The problems were; Some of the students were not able to develop their ideas in writing analytical exposition text well, the students were still confused to choose appropriate vocabulary in making analytical exposition text, the students did mistakes in applying the tenses related to analytical exposition text, such as present tense and future tense, and the students also did not know the way how to place the arguments in making analytical exposition text. The research was conducted with purpose to know whether or not there significant difference of student’s ability in writing analytical exposition for students were taught by using cubing technique and those who were taught by using tre phase technique. The design used in this research was nonequivalent control group design in Quasi-Experimental research.In collecting data, the writer used test, it was used in order to collect the data of ability in writing analytical exposition text at the second year students of SMAN 12 Pekanbaru. The tests consisted of two tests: Pretestwas used to determine student’s writing ability before getting the treatment and Posttestwas used to determine student’s writing ability after getting the treatment.In analyzing the data, the writer used Writing Assessment ( based on the school). The scores from the tests were analyzed by using test “T” formula in SPSS. The students’ score was compared with T-table considered with degree of freedom (df). From the research findings, the score of to was higher thanttable. It can be concluded that Ho is rejected and Ha is accepted. The students’ ability in writing anlytical exposition texttaught by using cubing technique is categorized into good level, while the students ability in writing analytical exposition taught by using tree phase technique is categorized into lless level. It means that there is a significant difference of writing ability in analytical exposition text between students who are taught by using cubing technique and those who are taught by using tree phase technique at the second year students of SMAN 12Pekanbaru.

Item Type: Thesis (Skripsi)
Subjects: 300 Ilmu Sosial > 370 Pendidikan > 373 Pendidikan Tingkat Sekolah Lanjutan > 373.238 Sekolah Menengah Atas, SMA
Divisions: Fakultas Tarbiyah dan Keguruan > Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris
Depositing User: eva sartika
Date Deposited: 10 Dec 2016 04:34
Last Modified: 10 Dec 2016 04:34
URI: http://repository.uin-suska.ac.id/id/eprint/9660

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item